Skip to Main Content

Title IX Toolkit: About Title IX

An Introduction to Title IX

Title IX of the Educational Amendments to the 1964 Civil Rights Act was signed into law in 1972. It bans any educational institution that receives federal funds from discriminating on the basis of sex, and applies to all academic and extra-curricular programs. Title IX has been praised as the chief factor behind the advances made in gender equity in education over the past three decades. In addition, the significant advances of women in higher education and in the workplace since the 1970s have been attributed by some to Title IX. Despite all this, Title IX is most well known for the impact it has had on intercollegiate athletics. The scale of women's collegiate athletic programs has increased exponentially during the past four decades, principally as a result of Title IX.

Cohen, A. L. (2021). Title IX. Salem Press Encyclopedia.

Title IX has been called "the most controversial topic in college sports," and its legacy has likewise been called "a legacy of debate" (Suggs, 2002). A component of the 1972 Educational Amendments to the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Title IX was designed to end discrimination on the basis of sex in education, just as Title IV of the original 1964 Civil Rights Act had been designed to end discrimination on the basis of race. While many claims have been made about the exact impact Title IX has had on gender equity in education, one result of Title IX is overwhelmingly clear: it began, and continues to fuel, a vigorous debate about funding for, participation in, and the purpose of intercollegiate athletics.

After the passage of Title IX, educational institutions accepted and applied the legislation to their academic programs without any resistance or debate (Suggs, 2002). Most college and secondary school athletic programs, however, virtually ignored Title IX until a series of Supreme Court decisions during the 1990s made it clear that lack of compliance left schools vulnerable to lawsuits with monetary-damage claims. Partly as a result of this threat of prosecution, educational institutions increased their efforts to comply with Title IX's athletic provisions throughout the 1990s (Anderson, Cheslock, & Ehrenberg, 2006, p. 227). These efforts persist, albeit not without continued controversy.

Over the first four decades of its existence, Title IX has garnered many vocal supporters and critics. The supporters praise Title IX for expanding women's educational opportunities and changing American culture's expectations of what women can achieve. The critics charge Title IX with discriminating against men, as efforts to comply with the legislation have led some institutions to eliminate men's teams in less widely popular sports such as wrestling and swimming. Despite these accusations, Title IX is legislation with which all educational institutions must comply.

Cohen, A. L. (2021). Title IX. Salem Press Encyclopedia.

The Political Climate Surrounding Title IX

During the late 1960s and the 1970s, the women's movement, what many refer to as the second wave of feminism, succeeded in focusing national attention on the sex-based inequalities that hampered American women's lives. One of the most deleterious of these inequalities was the earning gap between men and women. Although women had, by this time, become a vital part of the American workforce, female wage earners were rarely paid as much as their male peers. Women's organizations and advocacy groups asserted that this earnings gap could be traced back to sex-based inequalities in education. Women filed class action lawsuits against colleges, universities, and the US federal government, alleging that these institutions discriminated against women. All this encouraged Congress to focus on sexual discrimination in education and hold hearings on the subject in the summer of 1970 (U.S. Department of Justice, 2001).

This was the political climate out of which Title IX was born. Hoping to build on the momentum gained by the special hearings a year before, Representative Edith Green made an unsuccessful attempt to add a ban on sex-based discrimination to the 1971 Education Amendments. The next year, in an attempt to derail the renewal of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, conservative Southern congressmen added gender to the categories protected against discrimination. They hoped that the idea of equal opportunities for women would be distasteful enough to prevent the passage of the entire bill (Suggs, 2002). To their chagrin, the legislation was passed and Title IX became law.

Title IX & Athletics

Title IX prohibits any educational institution receiving federal funds from discriminating in any activity or program on the basis of sex. In all academic and extra-curricular fields except athletics, Title IX was adopted and applied with little or no controversy (Suggs, 2002). In contrast, decades passed before Title IX was effectively enforced in the field of athletics. When Title IX became law in 1972, most colleges simply did not have varsity sports teams for women. According to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), while approximately 170,000 men participated in college sports programs in 1972, just under 30,000 women also participated (Suggs, 2002). In the first few years after Title IX was passed, it was unclear what, if anything, colleges and universities would be required to do to remedy this situation. The first interpretation of how Title IX applies to intercollegiate athletics was not issued until 1975, with a delayed compliance date of 1978. These initial instructions were generally felt to be too vague, so a more comprehensive plan was issued by the US Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights in 1979 (Anderson et al., 2006).

Enforcing Title IX

Although the 1979 plan included a three-part test to prove compliance with the portion of Title IX dealing with athletics, the test was ignored throughout most of the 1980s. The Carter, Reagan, and George H. W. Bush administrations put a low priority on enforcing Title IX, and as a result, educational programs felt no real need to comply with the law (Anderson et al., 2006). When, in 1984, the Supreme Court ruled that Title IX was only applicable to the specific programs that directly received federal aid, athletic programs became legally exempt from compliance (Suggs, 2002). This situation lasted until 1988, when Congress, overriding a veto by President Reagan, enacted the Civil Rights Restoration Act. This law restored the broad interpretation of Title IX, in which Title IX applied to all programs or activities at institutions that received federal funds, whether or not a program was a direct recipient of these funds (U.S. Department of Justice, 2001).

Efforts on the part of collegiate athletic programs to enforce Title IX increased throughout the 1990s for several reasons. The US Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights is responsible for enforcing Title IX, and does so on a complaint-driven basis (Barnett, 2003). Until students started reporting discrimination, and doing so in such a way that threatened more than just inconvenience for educational institutions, Title IX would not be enforced. This process of upping the stakes of Title IX compliance began in 1992 when the Supreme Court ruled in Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools that the plaintiff in a Title IX lawsuit was entitled to monetary damages as long as the discrimination was intentional. In 1996, Cohen v. Brown University contributed to the increasing wariness on the part of colleges and universities of Title IX lawsuits. In this case, the Supreme Court held that Brown University was obliged to "adhere to strict criteria for demonstrating gender equity in intercollegiate athletics" (Anderson, et al., 2006, p. 228). This decision was particularly startling because Brown already had more women's sports teams than any other university besides Harvard. The decision convinced schools that until they were in strict compliance with Title IX, they would be vulnerable to lawsuits. Another factor that helped plaintiffs in such lawsuits was the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act, which Congress passed in 1994. This law mandated that institutions give free access to data about their men's and women's athletics programs. 

Cohen, A. L. (2021). Title IX. Salem Press Encyclopedia.

Content of Title IX

According to the US Department of Education, Title IX "is designed to eliminate (with certain exceptions) discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance" (Office for Civil Rights, 1980, p. 375). This essentially means that institutions must provide students with academic and extra-curricular opportunities on a "gender-neutral basis" (Anderson et al., 2005, p. 225). While Title IX is most well-known in relation to college athletics, the legislation is applicable to myriad other aspects of education. The text of Title IX specifies the law as being applicable to admission, recruitment, housing, facilities (such as locker rooms), access to course offerings, access to schools operated by local educational agencies (LEAs), counseling, financial assistance, employment assistance to students, health insurance benefits, athletics, textbooks and curricular materials, and marital/parental status. In regards to this last category, Title IX has made it illegal for high schools to prevent a pregnant teenager from finishing her degree (U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, 1980). Title IX additionally prohibits sexual harassment and requires, "as a condition of receipt of federal financial assistance [that] if a recipient is aware, or should be aware, of sexual harassment, it must take reasonable steps to eliminate the harassment, prevent its recurrence and, where appropriate, remedy the effects" (U.S. Department of Justice, 2001, p. 100). Only educational institutions that are operated by an entity controlled by a religious organization whose religious tenets are inconsistent with Title IX are exempted from enforcing the legislation's various provisions (U.S. Department of Justice, 2001, p. 11).

What Is Sex-Based Discrimination?

Title IX prohibits three distinct types of sex-based discrimination: disparate treatment, disparate impact, and retaliation. The US Department of Justice (2001) defines disparate treatment as "actions that treat similarly situated persons differently on the basis of a prohibited classification," such as sex (p. 57). Disparate impact "focuses on the result of the action taken, rather than the intent" (p. 63). Disparate impact applies to a policy that seems to be sex-neutral but that has the result of discriminating on the basis of sex. For example, a successful lawsuit brought against the National Merit Scholarship program claimed that by relying solely on SAT scores in determining scholarship eligibility, the program discriminated against female applicants (p. 67). Title IX's prohibition of retaliation is designed to protect people who file Title IX complaints as well as the people who investigate these complaints from retaliation by the accused. In short, it is intended to "preserve the integrity and effectiveness of the enforcement process itself" (p. 71).

Title IX & College Athletics

Title IX is most well known for its provisions related to college athletic programs. Title IX specifically requires schools to provide men's and women's sports programs with equal "benefits and services." This includes "scholarships, travel expenses, practice and competitive facilities, equipment and supplies, scheduling and practice times, and number and compensation of coaches and locker rooms" (Burnett, 2003). The legislation also contains more opaque compliance criteria. For this reason, the US Department of Education has issued very specific guidelines about what schools must do in order to be in compliance with Title IX.

Cohen, A. L. (2021). Title IX. Salem Press Encyclopedia.

Educational Institution: A local educational agency (LEA), meaning a school district that supervises public elementary and secondary schools; a preschool; a private elementary or secondary school; any institute of undergraduate or graduate higher education; or any institute of professional or vocational education.

Gender Equity: The equal and fair assignment of resources, opportunities, and decision-making responsibilities to both men and women.

Nonrevenue Sports: Often referred to as Olympic sports, this group includes swimming, wrestling, and men's gymnastics, among others. These sports do not typically generate revenue at the college level.

Revenue Sports: Collegiate level sports such as football and basketball, which sometimes (but not always) generate revenue through ticket sales or participation in major tournaments.

Sex-Based Discrimination: Situation in which the sex of an individual either directly or indirectly results in their receiving unequal treatment, all other factors being equal.

Three-Part Test: Devised by the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights, it is the primary means used to gauge institutional compliance with Title IX's athletic provisions.

US Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights: The mission of this government office is to ensure that all citizens are given equal access to education. This office assists those who face discrimination in education by resolving discrimination complaints and by attempting to prevent discrimination. The Office does this in part by helping institutions to reach voluntary compliance with all civil rights laws.

Cohen, A. L. (2021). Title IX. Salem Press Encyclopedia.

Works Cited

Anderson, D., Cheslock, J., & Ehrenberg, R. (2006) Gender equity in intercollegiate athletics: Determinants of Title IX compliance. Journal of Higher Education, 77 , 225-250. Retrieved March 16, 2007 from EBSCO Online Database Education Research Complete http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=19988333&site=ehost-live

Burnett, S. (2003, June 9). Revolution number IX. Community College Week, 15 , 6-9. Retrieved March 16, 2007 from EBSCO Online Database Education Research Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=10064699&site=ehost-live

Darden, E. (2007). Even out the playing field. American School Board Journal, 194 , 41-42. Retrieved March 16, 2007 from EBSCO Online Database Education Research Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=23639598&site=ehost-live

Fagan, K., & Cyphers, L. (2012, April 29). Five myths about Title IXZ. ESPN W. Retrieved December 12, 2013, from http://espn.go.com/espnw/title-ix/article/7729603/five-myths-title-ix

Kane, Mary Jo. (2012, September ). Title IX at 40: Examining mysteries, myths, and misinformation surrounding the historic federal law.Fortieth Anniversary of Title IX: Status of Girls’ and Women’s Sports Participation, 13, 2–9. Retrieved December 12, 2013, from https://www.presidentschallenge.org/informed/digest/docs/201209digest.pdf

Ladda, Shawn. (2012, September ). Examining Title IX at 40: Historical development, legal implications, and governance structures.Fortieth Anniversary of Title IX: Status of Girls’ and Women’s Sports Participation, 13, 10–20. Retrieved December 12, 2013, from https://www.presidentschallenge.org/informed/digest/docs/201209digest.pdf

McAndrews, P. J. (2012). Keeping Score: How universities can comply with Title IX without eliminating men's collegiate athletic programs. Brigham Young University Education & Law Journal, , 111–140. Retrieved December 13, 2013, from EBSCO Online Database Education Research Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=74995628

National Women’s Law Center. (2012, January 30). Debunking the myths about Title IX and athletics. Title IX Fact Sheet. Retrieved December 12, 2013, from http://www.nwlc.org/resource/debunking-myths-about-title-ix-and-athletics

Pieronek, C. F. (2012). The 2010 "dear colleague" letter on Title IX compliance for college athletic programs: Pointing the way to proportionality . . . again. Journal of College & University Law, 38, 277–318. Retrieved December 13, 2013, from EBSCO Online Database Education Research Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=75378461

Porto, B. (2005). Changing the game plan: A participation model of college sports. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 85 , 28-31. Retrieved March 16, 2007 from EBSCO Online Database Education Research Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=18973859&site=ehost-live

Stromquist, N. P. (2013). Education policies for gender equity: Probing into state responses. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21, 1–28. Retrieved December 13, 2013, from EBSCO Online Database Education Research Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=90024100

Suggs, W. (2002, June 21). Title IX at 30. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48 , A38-41. Retrieved March 16, 2007 from EBSCO Online Database Education Research Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=6884866&site=ehost-live

U.S. Department of Education. (1997). Title IX: 25 years of progress. Washington, D.C. Retrieved March 16, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/TitleIX/index.html

U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (1980). Title IX regulations. Washington, D.C. Retrieved March 16, 2007, from http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/cor/coord/titleix.htm

U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2005). Additional clarification of intercollegiate athletic policy: Three-part test - Part three. Washington, D.C. Retrieved March 16, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/title9guidanceadditional.html

U.S. Department of Justice. (2001). Title IX legal manual. Washington, D.C. Retrieved March 16, 2007, from http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/cor/coord/titleix.htm

Suggested Reading

Anderson, D. & Cheslock, J. (2004, May). Institutional strategies to achieve gender equity in intercollegiate athletics: Does Title IX harm male athletes? American Economic Review, 94 , 307-311. Retrieved March 16, 2007 from EBSCO Online Database Education Research Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=13708894&site=ehost-live

Gender equity in college sports. (2007). The Chronicle of Higher Education. Washington, D.C. Retrieved March 17, 2007 from http://chronicle.com/stats/genderequity

Hardy, L. (2012). The legacy of Title IX. American School Board Journal, 199, 12–15. Retrieved December 13, 2013, from EBSCO Online Database Education Research Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=78045786

Hogshead-Makar, N. (2003). The ongoing battle over Title IX. USA Today Magazine, 132(2698), p. 64-66. Retrieved March 16, 2007 from EBSCO Online Database Education Research Complete http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=10208246&site=ehost-live

Pickett, M., Dawkins, M. P., & Braddock, J. (2012). Race and gender equity in sports: Have white and African American females benefited equally from Title IX?. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 1581–1603. Retrieved December 13, 2013, from EBSCO Online Database Education Research Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=82506678

U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2004). Sex discrimination. Retrieved March 17, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/rights/guid/ocr/sex.html